I Have to Vent - Part 1

We have gone completely stupid - part 1.



I just can't take much more of this. All my life I have hoped to leave this world a better place for my kids than it was for me.

I have discovered I want to leave them the world I had because it was a better place. The world as I see it has now gone completely mad.

We the majority no longer have the gumption to speak up for what is right. Rather, we sit back and let a minority of people ruin America.

We are allowing our country to be destroyed from within. We no longer are able to think or do for ourselves, rather we want someone else to do the thinking and doing for us.

People today are lazy and think the world owes them something. Fact of the matter folks, the attorneys are leading the charge and we are following like sheep.


Utah’s Cross Controversy

The Utah Highway Patrol Association is faced with a lawsuit over placing by the side of the road crosses honoring state troopers killed in the line of duty.

On a highway in southern Utah, midway between Tropic and Cedar City, a mammoth cross marks the place where, 29 years ago this month, state trooper Lynn Pierson was killed by a car thief. His son Clint, a 36-year-old county deputy, sees the stark white memorial every time he takes his kids to the local Wal-Mart. "It's a huge source of pride," he says. "As a family, it helped us heal."

There are 14 such crosses, all of them 12 feet tall, scattered around the state, each bearing the name of a dead trooper and the Utah Highway Patrol insignia. They were erected by the privately-funded Utah Highway Patrol Association beginning in 1998, and whether they continue to stand is in the hands of a federal judge in Salt Lake City, who must decide if the crosses are symbols of remembrance or religion. U.S. District Judge David Sam heard arguments earlier this week on both sides of the constitutional debate, and has promised to rule soon.

The controversy started in December 2005, when American Atheists Inc. filed suit to have the markers removed, arguing that the cross is a universal symbol of Christianity and, when placed on public property, illegal. The lawsuit sparked outrage from the families of fallen officers, other police officers and legislators. Even some atheists went out of their way to dissociate themselves from the Texas-based group.

The crosses honor troopers who have died since 1931. Ten of the monuments are on public land, which required special permission from the state. "It was never our intent to do anything religious," says Lt. Lee Perry, who helped spearhead the project. "It was strictly to honor their memory."

Assistant attorney general Thom Roberts made the same argument in court. The cross, like Christmas and "Closed on Sunday," is a religious expression that evolved into a secular symbol, he said. To emphasize his point, Roberts held up pictures of telephone poles and showed a clip from Ben Casey, the 1960s TV medical drama. In it, Dr. David Zorba uses the cross as a generic symbol for death.

Roberts also argued that, since 11 of the 14 honored troopers were Mormons, members of a church that does not use the cross as a symbol of its beliefs, the monuments could hardly be considered a religious expression. "This is not about putting God back in the public space," Roberts says. "This is a memorial to officers who died in the line of duty."

I ask you, how many people does this offend?

Better yet, why are they offended as it does not hurt them?

Can someone tell me why an Atheist thinks everyone has to stop exhibiting a cross just because the Atheist doesn't like it?

Do Believers stop Atheists from expounding their beliefs? So as I see it, there is room for both to exhibit their beliefs.

I'm not done yet. See part 2 tomorrow!!